"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." -Matthew 7:15
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
The Apostle Paul was the anti-christ according to the first Christians
Disclaimer: I disagree with a few aspects of this video, notably their assertion that "Judaism" was the religion of the ancient Israelites, and that the "jews" are the true descendants of the Israelites. "Judaism" is a perversion of the Old Testament, due to Babylonian occultism influence from when the House of Judah was taken captive in Babylon. And the people today calling themselves "jews" today are NOT the biological descendants of the Israelites, but rather the descendants of a people called the Khazars (who converted to Judaism around the 8th century AD), and the Idumeans/Edomites (descendants of Esau).
Saturday, November 22, 2014
Who was Saul of Tarsus, aka "Paul"? A PHARISEE, Persecutor and Murderer of the Followers of Yahushua the Messiah, who switched to a covert tactic of infiltration in order to destroy the Gospel from within
Saul observing the stoning of Stephen
Saul of Tarsus was a leading Pharisee (and proclaimed "son of a Pharisee" - Acts 23:6), who lead the persecution of Yahushua and his followers. He was present at the stoning of Stephen (Acts 7:58).
As discussed here, the Messiah, Yahushua of Nazareth, repeatedly and strongly warned his followers to be on guard against the leaven/doctrine of the Pharisees, saying that false prophets would come and deceive MANY of his potential followers.
Based upon all of the evidence against Saul/Paul (outlined on this website, and concisely here) it is apparent that Saul/Paul decided that overt persecution of Yahushuah's followers was not the best tactic to destroy them, but rather covert infiltration and subversion. So he transformed from a persecutor and murderer of the Messiah's disciples into an infiltrator and deceiver who sought to attack the true message of the Gospel from within by masquerading as an "apostle", and spreading false doctrine.
Consider this hypothetical: What if a well known and infamous Satanist and murderer and persecutor of Christians (say like a Charles Manson figure, or a vehemently anti-Christian Jewish Rabbi) were to one day suddenly claim to have had a "miraculous conversion" to Christianity. What would you think of that claim, and of such a man? Would you be at least a little suspicious of the claim? Should he go to prison, perhaps face the death penalty for his crimes? What if this person didn't go to prison for their crimes, but was allowed to roam society as a free man spreading his new version of Christianity? Wouldn't you expect him to at least be extremely apologetic of his murders and crimes? What if this man hardly showed any remorse in his many writings for his crimes? And, incredibly, then this person goes on to have his writings included in the Bible! And it doesn't stop there. He is then somehow elevated to the title of "greatest apostle", even though he never genuinely was an apostle!
Yes, I was a murder and used to be a Satanist. But now I claim to be an "apostle" in my letters. Put my writings in the Bible and call me the "greatest apostle"!
Also, remember that Saul/Paul was not trained by the disciples, the men who walked, talked, and lived with the Messiah. He claimed to have received his knowledge from "revelations." He was not recognized by the true apostles as a genuine apostle. Paul claimed that title for himself.
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Saul Aka Paul-The False Prophet and Self Made Apostle
Source: http://islamgreatreligion.wordpress.com/2012/12/14/saul-aka-paul-the-false-prophet-and-self-made-apostle/ (Note: Author is apparently a muslim. This blog editor, of course, does not endorse Islam)
Saul Aka Paul-The False Prophet and Self Made Apostle
It is a common misconception amongst the Christians that Paul and Jesus’ Disciples were unanimous in their preaching of a crucified Jesus. Christians believe that Paul and the Disciples were preaching the same doctrine and everyone believed in the divine Jesus who came to be crucified for the sins of the world. However, if one carefully examines the bible, that person would see that Paul and the disciples were not preaching the same doctrine and did not believe in the same Jesus (pbuh).
The Apostles in Jerusalem heard that Paul has been preaching a different doctrine in Corinthia and Galatia. Paul was telling them not to follow the law anymore and that they don’t have to eat kosher meat anymore or to be circumcised (according to Genesis 17::14, the covenant is broken if there is no circumcision) etc. So the Apostles went to Galatia and Corinthia and convinced everyone that Paul is wrong, when Paul heard about this he went straight back to the cities.
“I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel”. [Galatians 1:6]It says different Gospel, so obviously the disciples were teaching them a different doctrine and it was not just minor issues.
The Disciples of Jesus (pbuh) remembered Paul’s persecutions towards the followers (early Christians) of Jesus. They were very suspicious of Paul. So when he finally came to them (41 B.C.E.) they didn’t believe his lie. They looked at him as a spy.
“And when Saul had come to Jerusalem he tried to Join himself with the Disciples but they were all afraid of him. And did not believe that he was a Disciple.” [Acts 9:26]. As you can see the Disciples didn’t trust him.
PAUL IN THE BIBLE ADMITS HE’S A LIAR AND A DECEIVER:
Paul said, “But be it so, I did not burden you nevertheless, being crafty, I CAUGHT YOU WITH GUILE.” [2 CORINTHIANS 12:16]Definition of GUILE: means ruse, sharp practice, treachery, trickery and wiliness.)
“For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?” [Romans 3:7]
WHAT JESUS IN THE BIBLE SAYS ABOUT THE LIAR:
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own; for he is a liar, and the father of it. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.” [John. 8:44-45]
WHAT JESUS SAYS ABOUT THE PHARISEES:
“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” [Matthew 23:15]
PAUL ADMITS HE’S A PHARISEE:
“But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question.” [Acts 23:6]
WHAT JESUS SAYS ABOUT PREACHING TO THE GENTILES:
“Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans. Go rather to the lost sheep of Israel.” [Matthew 10:5-6]
“But he Jesus answered and said, “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” [Matthew 15:24]
BUT PAUL SAYS DIFFERENT…WHO GAVE HIM AUTHORITY TO DO THIS?
Paul rejected this command of NOT preaching to the Gentiles, they were restricted. Paul openly preached among the Gentiles, a totally different religion, but then again paul wasn’t one of Jesus’ disciples anyways. The one who was to come for the Gentiles is mentioned in Isaiah 42. Who clearly is an Arab according to the description of his ancestor, “Kedar” and not a Jew Pharisee like Paul who then attempts to deceive many by assuming the role of the respected prophet to come as prophesied.
Paul said,”For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:” [Romans 11:13]
PAUL’S OWN CONTRADICTIONS:
WHEN PAUL WAS ON THE ROAD TO DAMASCUS HE SAW A LIGHT AND HEARD A VOICE. DID THOSE WHO WERE WITH HIM HEAR THE VOICE?
Yes- “And the men which journeyed with me stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.” [Acts 9:7]
No – “And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.” [Acts 22:9]
CONCERNING THE LAW…GOD & JESUS AGAINST PAUL THE LIAR:
THIS IS WHAT GOD SAYS ABOUT HIS LAW:
“Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you”. [Deuteronomy 4:2]
“The laws of God have to be considered and committed to memory for life. They have to be practiced, practiced, practiced. In a way, we have to drill, drill, drill, like a soldier in boot camp, so that they become instinctive behaviors. We have to force ourselves, if need be, to yield to them. This is our part in spiritual circumcision because human nature will put up a fight. It does not want to yield.” [Deut 6:4-7]
“You shall diligently keep the commandments of the LORD your God, and his testimonies and his statutes, which he has commanded you. And you shall do what is right and good in the sight of the LORD, that it may go well with you, and that you may go in and take possession of the good land that the LORD swore to give to your fathers.” [Deuteronomy 6:17-18]
“The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether.” [Psalms 19:79]
THIS IS WHAT JESUS SAYS ABOUT THE LAWS OF GOD:
“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.” [Matthew 5:17-20]
“And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.” [Luke 18:19]
BUT THIS IS WHAT PAUL SAYS ABOUT THE LAW WHICH CLEARLY CONTRADICTS BOTH GOD AND JESUS:
“Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.” [Romans 3:27-28]
“And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.” [Acts 13:39]
“For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.” [Gatatians 3:10-13]
“Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.” And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree.” [Galatians 2:16]
PAUL PLAGIARIZED THAT FROM THE TORAH AND HERE IT IS:
“And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree: His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;) that thy land be not defiled, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.” [Deuteronomy 21:22-23]
Think about this for one moment. Jesus came to observe and fulfill the law, but Paul said different, Jesus was sinless so therefore this passage should not be ascribed to Jesus. How can someone claim that Jesus was accursed of God and that the law was also a curse when it says different in other places of the Bible? According to Islam, Satan is accursed, not Jesus. Here is the definition of “accursed” so please understand what Paul is teaching in his false doctrine.
ACCURSED: 1. Abominable; hateful: 2. Being under a curse; doomed.
GOD SAYS THAT HIS LAW IS PERFECT NOT A CURSE:
PAUL IS THE FALSE PROPHET NO DOUBT ABOUT IT:
HISTORICAL QUOTES ABOUT PAUL AND HIS DOCTRINE FROM HISTORIANS, PHILOSPORS, AND THEOLOGIANS:
“Paul’s words are not the Words of God. They are the words of Paul- a vast difference.”(Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism, p. 104, Harper San Francisco, 1991).
Thomas Jefferson
“Paul was the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus.” (All references not listed here, can be found in Christianity Betrayed)
Carl Sagan (Scientist; Author)
“My long-time view about Christianity is that it represents an amalgam of two seemingly immiscible parts–the religion of Jesus and the religion of Paul. Thomas Jefferson attempted to excise the Pauline parts of the New Testament. There wasn’t much left when he was done, but it was an inspiring document.” (Letter to Ken Schei [author of Christianity Betrayed])
Albert Schweitzer
“Where possible Paul avoids quoting the teaching of Jesus, in fact even mentioning it. If we had to rely on Paul, we should not know that Jesus taught in parables, had delivered the sermon on the mount, and had taught His disciples the ‘Our Father.’ Even where they are specially relevant, Paul passes over the words of the Lord.”
Wil Durant (Philosopher)
“Paul created a theology of which none but the vaguest warrants can be found in the words of Christ.”
“Fundamentalism is the triumph of Paul over Christ.”
Walter Kaufmann (Professor of Philosophy, Princeton)
“Paul substituted faith in Christ for the Christlike life.”
George Bernard Shaw
“No sooner had Jesus knocked over the dragon of superstition than Paul boldly set it on its legs again in the name of Jesus.”
Thomas Hardy
“The new testament was less a Christiad than a Pauliad.”
Hyam Maccoby (Talmudic Scholar)
“As we have seen, the purposes of the book of Acts is to minimize the conflict between Paul and the leaders of the Jerusalem Church, James and Peter. Peter and Paul, in later Christian tradition, became twin saints, brothers in faith, and the idea that they were historically bitter opponents standing for irreconcilable religious standpoints would have been repudiated with horror. The work of the author of Acts was well done; he rescued Christianity from the imputation of being the individual creation of Paul, and instead gave it a respectable pedigree, as a doctrine with the authority of the so-called Jerusalem Church, conceived as continuous in spirit with the Pauline Gentile Church of Rome. Yet, for all his efforts, the truth of the matter is not hard to recover, if we examine the New Testament evidence with an eye to tell-tale inconsistencies and confusions, rather than with the determination to gloss over and harmonize all difficulties in the interests of an orthodox interpretation.” (The Mythmaker, p.139,Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1986)Jeremy Bentham (English Philosopher)
“If Christianity needed an Anti-Christ, they needed look no farther than Paul.” (Paraphrased. Looking for a copy of “Not Paul, but Jesus” in order to retrieve the exact quote.)
LET’S WRAP IT UP!
It’s obvious that Paul’s teachings is not in agreement with the teachings of Jesus, so therefore it is deception at best! Sorry to say but in many cases Christians quote a lot of Paul’s writings so in actualality they follow the teachings of Paul not God’s or Jesus’. Christians please humble yourselves and realise that you’re being deceived and lied to and it is now time to accept Islam and worship only God (Allah) alone in order to achieve true salvation and guidance. Ameen!
May Allah forgive me for any errors on my part, Ameen!
POINT OUT Errors or If there is any Lie We feed from our self….If Any Christian find and please Correct us…!
Saturday, November 8, 2014
Passage in 2 Peter purportedly supporting Paul's teachings must be fraudulent
Did the Apostle Peter truly endorse Paul?
Those who support the doctrines of Saul of Tarsus especially like to cite a passage in the book of 2 Peter as some of their "strongest evidence" to support the claim that Paul was a true follower of the Messiah and even an "Apostle".
This is somewhat controversial as well, but the evidence indicates that the book of 2nd Peter is actually what is called a "pseudograph", or a fake which was written by another person (probably many centuries after Peter was dead) and then falsely attributed to the apostle Peter. Apparently, even many "mainstream" Bible scholars now acknowledge and admit this, and it is proven by the writing style and other factors. The letter of 1st Peter is apparently genuine.
Putting that issue aside for a second, let's take a look at the passage concerning Paul.
2 Peter 3:15-16
15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
Looking at this passage carefully, we can see that it is fraudulent Take special notice of the phrase "also the other scriptures" in the passage. Now, assuming for the sake of argument that Peter truly wrote this book, would he actually refer to the writings of Saul/Paul as "scripture"...indicating it was on the level of the words/writings of the Old Testament prophets and the Messiah? If Peter actually wrote this, this presumably would have been written while Saul/Paul was still alive. Do you see the problem? Typically, you wait until the death of a supposed or self-professed prophet before "canonizing" their writings. You have to test and try a professed "prophet" to see their whole body of work, and determine whether what they say is true and comes to pass or not. Therefore, we can see that the book of 2nd Peter was most likely written several centuries after Peter's death by someone else.
And on the issue of how the writings of Paul can possibly be considered as "canon scripture", you have to ask yourself under what authority would one consider the letters and writings of Paul to be "canon scripture". What makes Paul any different from any other self-professed follower of the Messiah all down through history? Similarly, can we take the letters and writings of, say, Billy Graham or Rick Warren and put them in the Bible too? And what about even while those men are still alive? Preposterous.
Based upon this, we can conclude that this passage is fraudulent. Either Peter was not the author of this book....or if he was, this particular passage regarding Paul was inserted by someone else or altered by the translators. Either way, Peter most certainly would not have said these things about Paul.
Pharisee Saul of Tarsus was not even one of the 12 true Apostles!! There are only 12 apostles, and no more!
The 13th Apostle?
Saul/Paul was NOT one of the original 12 Apostles, and was not the replacement for Judas. So how can he claim to be an "apostle"?
Matthias was chosen by the remaining 11 Apostles as the replacement for Judas, as recorded in the book of Acts.
Acts 1:26: "And they gave forth their lots; and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles."
The remaining 11 Apostles decided that the criteria for the replacement for Judas was a person who accompanied them and the Messiah during his ministry from the baptism of John until the day he ascended into Heaven, and who witnessed the Messiah after he resurrected.
Acts 1:21-22: "Therefore it is necessary to choose one of the men who have been with us the whole time the Lord Jesus was living among us, beginning from John’s baptism to the time when Jesus was taken up from us. For one of these must become a witness with us of his resurrection.”
Saul of Tarsus did not meet these criteria. He did accompany the disciples during the entire course of the ministry of the Messiah. Saul was not taught the gospel by the Messiah.
The Gospels and Book of Revelation makes clear that there are only 12 apostles for all time:
Matthew 19:28 - "Jesus said to them, "Truly I tell you, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel."
Revelation 21:14 - "And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb."
Yet Saul/Paul over and over in his epistles claims to be an "apostle."
The reader should stop and really think about this for just a second. If the vast majority of self-professed "Christians" can be deceived on a lie as simple and easy to spot as the fact that Pharisee Saul was NOT one of the true 12 apostles, then WHAT ELSE are they being deceived about, in regards to religious doctrine or anything else? It's really frightening how easy Satan can deceive people. And I include myself in that category, as I was once deceived on Paul. It truly is a deeply powerful "spiritual" blindness and power that we are dealing with. It takes the blessing of the Most High to remove this powerful spiritual blindness from a person, and allow them to see the truth.
See also:
-Who was Saul of Tarsus, aka "Paul"? A PHARISEE, Persecutor and Murderer of the Followers of Yahushua the Messiah, who switched to a covert tactic of infiltration in order to destroy the Gospel from within
- Who exactly were the jewish Pharisees? As a Pharisee, Saul of Tarsus was a "child of hell" according to the words of the Messiah !! The Messiah STRONGLY warned his followers against the doctrines of the Pharisees. Why?
- Paul Teaches Against Keeping the Law of the Father, saying "we are no longer under the law", in direct contradiction to the Messiah who said we must keep the commandments in order to inherit eternal life. Pharisee Saul lays trap of Satan to damn people to hell!
Damning "Smoking Gun" Evidence Against Saul/Paul - Paul Admits To Timothy That All In Asia Have Rejected Him - In Revelation, Yahushua Commends the Ephesians For Rejecting False Apostles!
In Paul's second letter to Timothy, believed by many scholars to contain some his last recorded words, he makes a statement which is devastating to Paul's claim to apostleship:
2 Timothy 1:15 "This thou knowest, that all they which are in Asia be turned away from me;"
At that time, the term "Asia" referred to the area of modern-day Turkey. This is confirmed in the Book of Revelation, written to the "seven churches in Asia" (Revelation 1:4).
Ephesus, of course, was a city where Saul/Paul had attempted to win converts (see Paul’s letter to the Ephesians).
The fact that many Israelites in Asia opposed Saul/Paul is corroborated in the book of Acts where men from Asia accuse Paul of teaching against the Law, and bringing an Ephesian friend into the temple:
Acts 21: 27-29 "And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him, Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place. (For they had seen before with him in the city Trophimus an Ephesian, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple.)"
Now, examine what Yahshua the Messiah says to the Church at Ephesus in Revelation Chapter 2:
Revelation 2:1-2 "Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks; I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars"
Stop and consider the significance of this. Saul/Paul, the self-proclaimed "apostle", admits ALL of those in Asia, including the Ephesians, had rejected him. Then Yahshua commends the Ephesians for rejecting false apostles! If you have ears to hear and eyes to see, are you seeing/hearing this? Could it be much more obvious?
Here are the facts, paraphrased:
Paul to the Ephesians: "I am an apostle of Yahshua"
The Ephesians to Paul: "No you're not."
Yahshua to the Ephesians: "Well done!"
See also:
- Summary proving Saul of Tarsus is a false apostle and teacher - Overview of Major Arguments Against Paul
- Pharisee Saul of Tarsus was not even one of the 12 true Apostles!! There are only 12 apostles, and no more!
- Who was Saul of Tarsus, aka "Paul"? A PHARISEE, Persecutor and Murderer of the Followers of Yahushua the Messiah, who switched to a covert tactic of infiltration in order to destroy the Gospel from within
- Romans Chapter 13 - Saul/Paul Teaches That We Must Obey The Laws of Men, ie Government - Laying a Trap for YHWH's People To Obey Anti-Christ Beast System Unto Their Destruction
Paul Teaches Against Keeping the Law of the Father, saying "we are no longer under the law", in direct contradiction to the Messiah who said we must keep the commandments in order to inherit eternal life. Pharisee Saul lays trap of Satan to damn people to hell!
Of all the deceptions of Satan's apostle Saul/Paul, this is the the most critical and important aspect.
Paul's own writings clearly demonstrate that he taught a completely different doctrine than that of Yahushua the Messiah. The false apostle Saul/Paul taught against keeping the commandments of YHWH, saying that "the law has been abolished", that “no one is justified by the law”, that those who "rely on observing the law are under a curse", and that “we are not under the law”.
Why is this important? Because Yahushua of Nazareth the Messiah taught the exact opposite, specifically stating that he did not come to destroy the law, and that one must "do the will of the Father" and keep His commandments in order to obtain eternal life.
The requirement for eternal life. What could be more important than that?
As a Pharisee and servant of Satan, Saul/Paul cannot suffer to have the Heavenly Father's people enter eternal life, as the Messiah told the Pharisees as recorded in Matthew 23:13, stating: "But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in."
Yahushua teaches that only those who obey the Law of YHWH will be saved:
Matthew 19:16-21 "And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me."
Matthew 7:21-23 "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
Pharisee Infiltrator Saul/Paul taught that the Law of YHWH was a "curse", "no one is justified by the law", "the law has been abolished", "we are not under the law", and a nebulous doctrine of "salvation by grace through faith":
Galatians 3:10-14 "All who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written: "Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law." Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because, "The righteous will live by faith." The law is not based on faith; on the contrary, "The man who does these things will live by them." Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: "Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree." He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit."
Romans 6:14 "For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace."
Here in his letter to the Ephesians, Saul teaches that the Messiah "abolished the law of commandments":
Ephesians 2:15 "Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;"
Yet Yahushua the Messiah said:
Matthew 5:17-20 "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven."
Saul teaches that all one has to do in order to be "saved" is "believe and confess":
Romans 10:9 "That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved."
If that is all that is required, do not devils and sons of devils intellectually acknowledge that Yahshua is the Messiah and that he was raised from the dead? What differentiates the wicked/unsaved from the righteous/saved, is that the saved obey the commandments of YHWH.
See also:
- Pharisee Saul of Tarsus was not even one of the 12 true Apostles!! There are only 12 apostles, and no more!
- Who was Saul of Tarsus, aka "Paul"? A PHARISEE, Persecutor and Murderer of the Followers of Yahushua the Messiah, who switched to a covert tactic of infiltration in order to destroy the Gospel from within
- Who exactly were the jewish Pharisees? As a Pharisee, Saul of Tarsus was a "child of hell" according to the words of the Messiah !! The Messiah STRONGLY warned his followers against the doctrines of the Pharisees. Why?
- Damning "Smoking Gun" Evidence Against Saul/Paul - Paul Admits To Timothy That All In Asia Have Rejected Him - In Revelation, Yahushua Commends the Ephesians For Rejecting False Apostles!
- Paul, the founder of apostate Churchianity - The Messiah said we have only one teacher and one pastor (shepherd), and preachers of the gospel should "freely give"; Saul of Tarsus advocated many "teachers" and "pastors", and said preachers should be monetarily paid
- The false prophet Saul of Tarsus is a great "test" from the Most High to determine who truly loves Him
Romans Chapter 13 - Saul/Paul Teaches That We Must Obey The Laws of Men, ie Government - Laying a Trap for YHWH's People To Obey Anti-Christ Beast System Unto Their Destruction
The AntiChrist System - Obey?
Saul of Tarsus not only taught his followers to not follow the Law of the Heavenly Father. He went further. He said you must obey the Governments of this world -- the same worldly powers and governments which Satan is now in control of.
First of all, we must establish the fact that Satan is temporarily the "god" of this world, and controlling the kingdoms and governments of this world. The visions given to Daniel and the Apostle John in the book of Revelation illustrated that Satan (the "seven-headed beast" and "Dragon") was the power behind various world empires down through history -- often interpreted as including Babylon, Greece, and Rome.
This Satanic control of the kingdoms of the earth is further confirmed in Matthew Chapter 4, where Satan tempts the Messiah on a high mountain, telling him that he will give him the kingdoms of the earth if he will fall down and worship Satan. Satan could offer this to the Messiah because he did, in fact, control the kingdoms of the earth. Psalm 2:2 supports this fact as well: "The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us."
Paul says in Romans 13:1-13:
"Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority?"
When you really think about this passage by Paul, it is astonishing. So I guess according to Saul/Paul, the early followers of the Messiah in the Roman Empire should have just bowed down and worshiped Caesar as a "god"? And what should we today do if an"anti-Christ" government command us to take the Mark of the Beast? According to Paul we should take the mark of the Beast, because we "must" obey the government.
Should Daniel have complied with King Darius of Persia's law forbidding him to pray to the Heavenly Father, in order to avoid being thrown into the lion's den? As recorded in the Old Testament, the Israelites Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego refused to worship an image of Nebuchadnezzar (king of Babylon), and were thrown into a fiery furnace.
The entire history of the Bible is one of the Father's chosen people having to stand up against governments and other powers of this world, which are temporarily under the control of Satan. Yahushua of Nazareth the Messiah was murdered by the ruling "authorities" and government of his day. Most of his true 12 Apostles were also murdered by governments. And the followers of the Messiah in early Rome were then murdered for not complying with decrees which violated the Law of the Most High.
See also:
- Who exactly were the jewish Pharisees? As a Pharisee, Saul of Tarsus was a "child of hell" according to the words of the Messiah !! The Messiah STRONGLY warned his followers against the doctrines of the Pharisees. Why?
- Paul Teaches Against Keeping the Law of the Father, saying "we are no longer under the law", in direct contradiction to the Messiah who said we must keep the commandments in order to inherit eternal life. Pharisee Saul lays trap of Satan to damn people to hell!
- Having said that the Law is now "abolished", Pharisee Saul said our new moral code is that "all things are lawful", which is the law of Satan !!
- Pharisee Saul/Paul introduced doubt of the word of the Father, double-mindedness, and the Satanic doctrine of duality
- Saul is an anti-Christ and a true "man of lawlessness"
The Problem With Saul/Paul's Claim of "Conversion" On The Road To Damascus - Contradictory Accounts
Saul on the road to Damascus. Did this really even occur, as he claimed?
Saul/Paul claims to have been "converted" on the road to Damascus (on his way to arrest followers of the Messiah). But there are problems with this claim. There are three separate accounts of this "conversion event" in the Book of Acts, and they all contradict each other, demonstrating that Saul is lying about it. Secondly, the Scripture says that "at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established" (Deuteronomy 19:15 ), yet Saul never gives us the names of any witnesses to this "conversion event." Like his claim to "apostleship", we are left to take his word alone.
Account #1:
Acts 9:1-7 " And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest, And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem. And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man."
Note in account above that the author of Acts (Luke, a companion of Paul) says that the men traveling with Saul stood there speechless, they heard the sound, but did not see anyone. Also note here that the voice only tells him to arise and go into the city and THERE it shall be told him what to do.
Account #2: (Saul/Paul speaking to the Jews in Jerusalem):
Acts 22:1-9 "Men, brethren, and fathers, hear ye my defence which I make now unto you. I am verily a man which am a Jew, born in Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, yet brought up in this city at the feet of Gamaliel, and taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers, and was zealous toward God, as ye all are this day. And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women. As also the high priest doth bear me witness, and all the estate of the elders: from whom also I received letters unto the brethren, and went to Damascus, to bring them which were there bound unto Jerusalem, for to be punished. And it came to pass, that, as I made my journey, and was come nigh unto Damascus about noon, suddenly there shone from heaven a great light round about me. And I fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? And he said unto me, I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest. And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me."
Note in account above that Saul/Paul says that the men traveling with Saul did NOT hear the sound, but saw a light, contradicting the account above from Acts, Chapter 9.
Account #3: (Paul before King Agrippa):
Acts 26:12-18 "Whereupon as I went to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests, At midday, O king, I saw in the way a light from heaven, above the brightness of the sun, shining round about me and them which journeyed with me. And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest. But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee; Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee, To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me."
In this account, Paul claims that the voice told him these things he was to do THERE ON THE ROAD. This is a clear departure from the other accounts of the event. The stories cannot be reconciled. At least one is not true.
See also:
- Deciding what is "canon". The "Bible" is NOT inerrant. It is a collection of books, largely chosen by cronies of the Roman Emperor and the corrupt Catholic Church
- Passage in 2 Peter purportedly supporting Paul's teachings must be fraudulent
- Pharisee Saul of Tarsus was not even one of the 12 true Apostles!! There are only 12 apostles, and no more!
- Summary proving Saul of Tarsus is a false apostle and teacher - Overview of Major Arguments Against Paul
Saul Directly Contradicts the Messiah on How to Pray
The Messiah withdrew to lonely places when he prayed
Yahushua of Nazareth the Messiah taught his followers to pray in secret...not like the hypocrites, the Pharisees, who prayed out in public:
Matthew 6:5-6
And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
False apostle and Pharisee Saul of Tarsus on how to pray...like the Pharisees!:
1 Timothy 2:7-8
Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;) a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and verity.
8 I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting.
Again, not that Saul was a Pharisee. So is it any wonder, then, that he taught that we should pray as the Pharisees do?! Out in public, making a show in front of people? And the Messiah specifically warned against praying as the "hypocrite" Pharisees! Let those who have eyes to see and ears to hear do so.
Is it any wonder, then, how the leaders and so-called "pastors" and "priests" of the modern-day apostate "Christian" churches lead their congregations in prayers out in the open? Is this following the teaching of the Messiah? Or of the false teacher Paul? This is following the way of the hypocritical Pharisees, and more about putting on a show, rather than a demonstration of true piety and close relationship with the Heavenly Father.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)